20 Silent Code Failures. Zero Warnings. One Tool Caught Them All.
A controlled benchmark — same model, same prompt, three different setups. Here's what the data showed.
Read more →A benchmark showing how intelligent caching eliminates the cost of repeat AI queries entirely. Real numbers, real methodology.
Businesses running AI at scale pay full LLM cost on every query. Repeat questions — same API patterns, same framework questions, same validation checks — cost exactly as much the hundredth time as the first.
There’s no reason for that.
The logic is simple:
Query comes in → cache checked first → if matched, returns instantly at $0.00 → LLM never called.
The first time a query runs, the LLM handles it and the result is cached. Every subsequent identical or near-identical query is served from cache. No tokens burned. No cost. The answer already exists — the system just returns it.
We ran the same validation query three ways:
| First Query | Repeat Query | 10 Queries | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | $0.005227 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Tokens used | 8,745 | 0 | 0 |
| Source | LLM | Cache | Cache |
| Savings | — | 100% | 100% |
First query warms the cache. Every query after: free.
Run 3A cost $0.005227 and consumed 8,745 tokens — a normal LLM call. Run 3B: $0.00, zero tokens. Run 3C: ten queries, $0.00 total, 100% cache hit rate. The LLM was called exactly once across all ten runs.
In a development team asking dozens of coding questions daily, cache hit rate compounds over time.
Common patterns — framework syntax, API methods, validation rules — get cached once and served free forever. The second developer asking about SQLAlchemy 2.0 syntax gets the same verified answer as the first, instantly, at zero cost. The tenth developer asking the same question costs nothing.
At scale, you’re paying full LLM price for a shrinking fraction of your traffic. The rest is cached. As usage grows, cost per query drops — not because you’re cutting corners, but because the system gets smarter about what it already knows.
Net-new queries still cost tokens. The cache doesn’t replace the LLM for novel work — it eliminates cost for repeat and near-repeat queries.
In most production systems, those repeat queries make up the majority of traffic. The same frameworks, the same validation patterns, the same API conventions get asked about constantly. Cache those once, and the economics shift significantly.
Novel questions get the full LLM treatment. Known answers get served instantly. That’s the right division of labor.
Hallucination Guard is currently in private beta. Apply for early access →
Benchmark conducted April 15, 2026. Model: claude-opus-4-6 via OpenRouter. All costs estimated based on published token pricing. Results reflect a controlled test environment and may vary in production.
CertainLogic builds deterministic AI tools for small businesses. Fixed price. No surprises.
A controlled benchmark — same model, same prompt, three different setups. Here's what the data showed.
Read more →